In the article "Do All Problems Have Technical Fixes?" Robin K. Hill explores the pervasive belief in the technology imperative, which posits that every problem can be addressed with a technical solution. This notion, often referred to as tech solutionism, suggests that technological advancements are inherently beneficial and should be applied to various challenges, regardless of their nature. Hill critiques this mindset, highlighting its implications and the underlying assumptions that drive it. The discussion begins by referencing the views of various tech leaders who advocate for the transformative power of artificial intelligence (AI) in everyday life. These leaders often promote their products with the assertion that they not only solve significant problems but also enhance users' confidence in technology. Hill notes that this promotion reflects a broader attitude within Silicon Valley, where technology is seen as a panacea for societal issues, often sidelining the potential costs and drawbacks associated with its implementation. Hill delves into the philosophical underpinnings of this tech imperative, questioning the normative value assigned to computing technologies. She argues that the belief in the goodness of technology is not merely a pragmatic observation but a deeper, unexamined conviction that needs scrutiny. The article suggests that this belief is rooted in a series of premises that equate the presence of a problem with the necessity for a technological fix, leading to a cycle of continuous technological development without critical evaluation. The author emphasizes the need to shift the focus from mere assertions of technology's benefits to a more nuanced understanding of the motivations behind promoting AI and other technologies. By analyzing the actions of tech leaders through the lens of philosophical inquiry, Hill identifies a pro-attitude—an inherent judgment of value that drives the promotion of technology. This perspective raises questions about the psychological and cultural factors that contribute to the unwavering confidence in technology as a solution. Ultimately, Hill concludes that the tech imperative is less about logical reasoning and more about a prevailing attitude that technology is inherently good. This realization prompts further inquiry into the psychological motivations behind this belief, suggesting that a deeper understanding of these dynamics is essential for critically engaging with the role of technology in society. The article calls for a more reflective approach to technology, urging stakeholders to consider the broader implications of their reliance on technical fixes for complex problems.